| UNIX/Linux Forum Archives · Rules and Guidelines · Disclaimer |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| fishsponge |
Posted: Apr 10 2003, 10:10 AM
|
||
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 679 Member No.: 1 Joined: 13-February 03 |
http://www.theregister.com/content/4/30179.html
Read more... It's basically, a much better version of the chroots currently used today... and after reading this article, it seems like a *very* good idea to me!! :D |
||
| pfinder |
Posted: Apr 10 2003, 10:21 PM
|
|
User Level: 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 36 Member No.: 3 Joined: 14-February 03 |
linus get you ass in gear I want that :)
|
| fishsponge |
Posted: Apr 11 2003, 08:25 AM
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 679 Member No.: 1 Joined: 13-February 03 |
that's what i think too!! :D
solaris has had it for ages! at least since Solaris 8. In Solaris 8 they're called "chroots", in solaris 9 they're called "containers", and in solaris 10 it appears they're called "zones"!! The main difference between zones and containers/chroots is that you can still have the two interacting closely. Each chroot has it's own set of necessary binaries, but some of the (virtual) devices are shared, and also we use scripts in "/etc/rc3.d" on the main system to start things up inside each chroot. i'm not sure how this would work with the new zones. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |